Australian Islamist Monitor

Islam Under Scrutiny

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home Confronting Islam Infidel Resistance FORCEFIELD - an NGO Force for GOOD

FORCEFIELD - an NGO Force for GOOD

E-mail Print PDF

We at AIM have frequently lamented the corruption of NGOs, which even if initially set up as a force for good, now mainly champion Islamic supremacist aspirations, while ignoring the oppression of  its many victims. Here's an example of two BAD NGOs:

1. Geoff Dickson wrote in
UNRWA – the Really Wicked Agency - (24-02-09):

In 1948 neighboring Arab states urged Arabs living in Israel to leave because they were going to destroy Israel. As a result up to 600,000 Arabs moved into the Gaza area and were settled into “temporary” camps. The Gaza area is now home to some 4,200,000 “refugees”.

A video on UNRWA shows:

        * 1.The UN Commissioner claiming that HAMAS did not violate the truce and a graph showing Hamas actually fired 120 rockets into Israel;
        * 2.Young school kids, products of UNRWA schools, chanting Jihadi statements towards Israel
        * 3.an UNRWA official denying rockets were fired from a UNRWA building, and a video of a rocket firing from the base of the building;
        * 4.HAMAS fighters using UN ambulances to transport their fighters
        * 5.Houses that Israel built in the early 1970’s to accommodate the refugees but which have been ignored by UNRWA and left vacant.

The Palestinian education system is funded through the UNRWA, which employs some 18,000 Palestinians in over 250 schools it operates in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
But UNRWA-paid teachers in UNRWA-built schools are teaching from textbooks with anti-Semitic, anti-Israeli and anti-coexistence indoctrination.

UNRWA was established over 60 years ago with a one year mandate to support refugees from Israel. Today it’s conduct suggests that it should be closed down as it has failed miserably in its objectives, and has openly promoted hate.

2. Another deplorable NGO is World Vision (see . Aussie Dhimwit of the Month (November 2009), whose Chief Executive in Australia, Rev. Tim Costello, champions Islamist causes, yet is seemingly indifferent to the suffering of their victims.

...World Vision and Tim are vehemently anti-Israel and pro-Palestinian:

From NGO Monitor Digest (Vol. 2 No. 12), August 15, 2004:

    …ignoring the terrorism that was responsible for the deaths of Israeli civilians, World Vision promotes an amoral equivalence between perpetrators and victims of terror, offering no context to the loss of life. Instead, Israeli security measures are described as a "policy of sealing entries and exits to cities, villages, and towns as a form of collective punishment of the Palestinian population."
 
World Vision's response to Israel's security barrier displays almost no acknowledgment of its impact in preventing terror. Tim Costello described the barrier as "part of the problem, not part of the solution", evoking the highly politicized and inappropriate claim that the barrier is reminiscent of the Cold War and Eastern Bloc oppression. (His comparison reflects the Palestinian propaganda effort to compare the Berlin Wall, designed to keep citizens from fleeing, with Israel's security barrier, which saves the lives of its citizens.)

This NGO is particularly active in promoting crude propaganda in the UN framework...in 2007, World Vision's Thomas Getman, continued this pattern in a speech in Geneva marking the 60th anniversary of UN Resolution 181, which called for the creation of two states, one Arab and one Jewish. His speech failed to mention ongoing Palestinian terrorist and missile attacks against Israel, and he used highly manipulative, emotionally charged rhetoric.
...World Vision’s statement in the inaugural session of the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in June 2006, exploited the suffering of Palestinian children in order to launch a political attack on Israel. 

 

World Vision CEO Tim Costello

   * His devotion to child welfare doesn't extend to Israeli child victims:

If it comes down to a conflict between the quality of life and the right to life, ethics would indicate the latter should take precedence. Yet neither Tim Costello ("For the children's sake, tear down this wall!" ) nor the International Court of Justice seem to think this elemental moral rule applies to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

... the failure of the court to even consider "Israel's legitimate right of self-defence, military necessity, and security needs, given the repeated deadly terrorist attacks in and upon Israel . . . cannot be justified as a matter of law".

... Essentially, the argument of the court, and by implication Costello, is that Israel must turn the other cheek to the terrorists because practical steps to fight Hamas et al - groups that seek not self-determination but Israel's destruction - are all illegal.  (source)

But there's some good news on the horizon, with the founding of FORCEFIELD, an NGO dedicated to championing the cause of the oppressed rather than the oppressor.
In the words of its founder Dr. Richard Benkin:

Forcefield is a non-agenda driven human rights NGO. That means we are not anti-Israel, anti-US, anti-Conservative, etc., like the other human rights NGOs. It also means that we will take on the human rights violations those other organizations ignore, including those perpetrated by Islamists and those perpetrated against Jews, Hindus, and Christians. At our first Board Meeting, we agreed that the two issues we are taking up first are the ethnic cleansing of Bangladeshi Hindus and the ongoing persecution of Muslim Zionist Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury in Bangladesh. As we gain strength, people, and resources, we will take on more.

Dr. Richard L. Benkin



FORCEFIELD's primary concern is to stop the ethnic cleansing of Bangladeshi Hindus, and on these trips I met with victims and victimizers (Islamists and Communists); and I gather solid evidence which I have been providing to members of the US Congress and Senate, as well as the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom. We are making tremendous progress in Washington on that front.

The trip also fulfills an important educative function in India, where we are increasing understanding among the people that the threat faced by India and Israel (as well as ultimately the rest of us) is the same. And we have made significant inroads in organizing pro-Israel and anti-Islamist groups there, especially among the youth and even on campuses with a notoriously leftist and anti-Israel orientation. Last year I spoke at the Supreme Court, several universities, and in numerous groups--as well as fighting for the Bangladeshi Hindus in the refugee camps along terrorist-infested borders.

I have been working with several Indians to make a documentary film on the plight of Hindus in West Bengal, Assam, and Kashmir. We also will document how it is part of a wider jihad and threatens all of us, as well as being part of the jihad against Israel.

And, of course, gathering the information and educating people in Washington about it also falls under Forcefield's mandate. We are always on the lookout for instances like the January conference in Australia... Since no one seems to be using that success as a template for similar successes, I am hoping that Forcefield will.

Sounds good to me, and no doubt to many of my fellow Aussies, who have long ago seen through the malevolence parading as human rights and are irritated with the supine and politically correct attitude of our leaders.

What's more, there's an Aussie component to all this. In A Small Victory Down Under, Dr. Benkin explains:

An anti-Israel conference scheduled to be held in an official Australian state building was canceled after a small group of dedicated individuals revealed the conference leader’s anti-Semitic motives. Maqsood Alshams, an illegal immigrant from Bangladesh, planned the conference to debate the issue of charging Israel with war crimes for its recent actions in Gaza. Since arriving Down Under in the 1990s, Alshams had become a darling of the Australian left and became known as a “human rights” advocate. It is within that context that spews his relentless anti-Israel venom.

On December 30, I received one of Alshams’ emails, which quoted Malaysia’s Foreign Minister condemning Israel for “disproportionate, indiscriminate and excessive use of force in Gaza and… collective punishment imposed by the Occupying Power on the Palestinian people.” The email fell back on the usual illogical set of human rights accusation against the Jewish state, including the allegation that Israel’s defensive war was a “crime against humanity.” There was nothing remarkable about the email, and I normally do not bother responding to them. But this one came from Australia where the anti-Israel propaganda war–largely over in Europe and in its infancy in the United States—is in full swing. Moreover, email recipients included members of the Australian media who seemed to believe that Alshams’ pro-Palestinian passion was prompted by nothing more than a morally pure commitment to human rights. So I responded. What I sent was this.

      “Why didn’t these same people cry for ‘international intervention’ when the Palestinians–and Hamas in particular–thanked Israel for leaving Gaza by making it a terrorist base to lob missiles onto civilian populations in Southern Israel? Where were these same people when Israeli civilians were facing constant rocket attack from Hamas and its allies?”

What I got back was as much a surprise as it was a gift.

“The simple answer,” Alshams wrote, “is that you the Jews are real motherfucker bastards. In 1990 I myself entered in to the Jewish Consulate in Istanbul in Turkey as a law abiding citizen, met two Jewish Diplomats named Hayim Hosen and Eli Lev, I was stripped searched, sexually harassed, personally humiliated by Mohsad agents, you should keep your dirty mouth shut calling any Bangladeshi a brother, you guys are simply assholes. I don’t want to make this an international issue being secured in Australia. But simply Jews like you are the dirty scums… Stop playing the bloody victim games. You scums need to leave Palestine ASAP and give world a bit of peace… and keep your dirty mouth shut…I wonder why God himself hate the Jews…” (The dots are not of my doing. I have replicated Alshams’ email exactly as I received it.)

Not surprisingly, Alshams did not share these sentiments with the larger group; so I did. I also decided to find out more about him. Alshams has convinced Australians that he was a journalist in Bangladesh who had to flee for fear of his life. He alleges that he worked for a paper owned by one powerful party and was threatened by their political opponents. That would suggest he was pretty important. Yet, when Bangladeshi journalist Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury investigated, he found no one who could say if Alshams “ever worked with any newspaper here.” He also said that nobody at the National Press Club ever heard of Maqsood Alshams. Choudhury, by the way, is the Bangladeshi who Alshams did not want me to call brother. But when he was imprisoned and tortured for writing pro-US, pro-Israel, and anti-Islamist articles, I led the campaign that freed him. Alshams and his ilk did nothing. So when he emerged from the hell of that confinement, it was Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury who said, “When my own people abandoned me, my Jewish brother protected me, stood with me.”

... the masquerade over on January 28 when the Herald ran the story. Reporter Erik Jensen noted that Alshams at first tried to defend the hate-speech as a “private argument.” He said he was “not an anti-Semite at all. I have many Jewish friends.” Well, when he saw that no one was buying his “some of my best friends” defense, he apologized for what he said, blaming it on being “intoxicated and angry.” While Jensen’s article said that backers were not pulling out of the conference, a follow up piece the next day told a different story. The conference had been canceled. The revelations spoiled its public façade of being fair and conducted out of the purest of motives.

Alshams’ “I was drunk” argument did not hold water. He clearly had the presence of mind not to send the offensive email to the wider group for fear of damaging his reputation; not indicative of being drunk. He also telephoned me about two hours later, and repeated the anti-Jewish remarks in a voice not at all marred by slurred speech or the sort of incoherence that marks someone intoxicate. More to the point, being drunk would explain the bad judgment of making the remarks and revealing his bias, but it would not explain away the bias itself. As they say, in vino veritas.

The significance of this small victory goes beyond the episode itself. For Israel’s enemies have successfully—and fallaciously—appropriated the human rights high ground. Talking heads in academia, the media, and government in several nations have allowed them to engage in the worst sort of illogic and hate speech by adopting their version of history and morality. No hyperbole is out of bounds for them. They love to compare Israelis to Nazis and Palestinians to Jewish holocaust victims, though there is no similarity between the two. They have so terribly skewed the ideological playing field that Hamas can use Arab civilians as human shields then accuse Israel of human rights violations when those civilians become casualties of war.

Incidents like this expose the real motivations of the anti-Israel movement and stripped away its cynical use of human rights language. And it must be done again and again and again until the truth finally wins back the day. (source)

One small victory maybe, but nonetheless it shows what just one determined person can do to expose the fraud that is being perpetrated on us. Actions like this by brave individuals serve as an inspiration to those of us who want to uphold our  democracy against the incipient threat of  totalitarian Islam.

I suspect we shall hear plenty more about FORCEFIELD in the near future and wish it success in its efforts to expose the hatred and lies behind faux human rights groups, who wish to destroy democracies like Australia, America, India and Israel.

Say NO to Sharia and its Marxist enablers!

Comments (0)add comment

Write comment

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
 

AIM Listed by NLA

pandora

Australian Islamist Monitor's web publications were selected for preservation by the National Library of Australia. Access to our materials stored in the NLA Archive is facilitated in two ways: via the Library’s online catalogue; and via subject and title lists maintained on the PANDORA home page.
Click HERE for direct access to the archive

Support AIM

Donate using PayPal
Amount:

Polls

Aussie Dhimwit of the Month (January 2010)
 

Who's Online

We have 353 guests and 1 member online

Islam Kills

We Stand Against Islam

  • We Stand Against Islam
  • We Stand Against Islam
  • We Stand Against Islam
  • We Stand Against Islam
  • We Stand Against Islam
  • We Stand Against Islam
  • We Stand Against Islam
  • We Stand Against Islam
  • We Stand Against Islam
  • We Stand Against Islam
  • We Stand Against Islam
  • We Stand Against Islam
  • We Stand Against Islam
  • We Stand Against Islam
  • We Stand Against Islam
  • We Stand Against Islam
  • We Stand Against Islam
  • We Stand Against Islam
  • We Stand Against Islam
  • We Stand Against Islam
  • We Stand Against Islam

History - Articles

Islamic Pirates
Barbary Corsair
Somalian Islamic Pirates & Lessons from History
 
The dramatic rescue of the American cargo-ship captain Richard Phillips from the hands of Somalian Islamic pirates by the U.S. Navy—killing three pirates, holding him hostage at gun-point, through precision-targeting—warrants a review of the U.S. struggle with piracy and hostage-taking in North Africa, which ended two centuries ago.

Raiding trade-caravans and hostage-taking for extracting ransom in Islam was started by Prophet Muhammad. Having become powerful and secure after his relocation to Medina from Mecca in 622, Muhammad initiated Jihad or holy war in the form of raids of trade-caravans for earning livelihood for his community. In the first successful raid of a Meccan caravan at Nakhla in December 623, his brigands killed one of the attendants, took two of them captive, and acquired the caravan as “sacred” booty. The captives were ransomed to generate further revenue. Muhammad, later on, expanded this mode of Jihad to raiding non-Muslim communities around Arabia—for capturing their homes, properties and livestock, capturing their women and children as slaves often for ransoming and selling, and imposing extortional taxes—which sometimes involved mass-slaughter of the attacked victims.
Read more
 
The Battle of Broken Hill
Battle of Broken Hill Logo
 
The First Islamic Terrorist Attack on Australian Soil
 
On January 1, 1915 two Broken Hill men, both former camel drivers, armed themselves with rifles, an homemade flag bearing Islamic insignia and a large supply of ammunition and launched a surprise attack on the Picnic Train about 3 kilometres outside Broken Hill.

The train carried about 1200 Broken Hill residents to Silverton where a picnic to celebrate the new year was to take place.

The two Muslim men, Gool Mohamed originally a Pashtun tribesman from Afghanistan and Mullah Abdullah from what is known today as Pakistan, decided to wage jihad against Australian infidels after Australia and the Ottoman Empire officially joined the opposite sides in the WWI.
Read more
 

Jihad Galore

Jihad Galore and the Toledo Whore

Battle of Higueruela

Alhambra - GazelleHow often in conversation with a Muslim, do they quote Spain as the crowning achievement of Islam, where Muslims, Jews and Christians lived in harmony for about 800 years?

And when you mention the killings and massacres, you are told that the Spanish Inquisition was much worse.
This is a misconception, since the Inquisition in Spain was responsible for only between 4,000 and 5,000 lives. [1]

Yet in 1066AD, in a single day, muslims murdered over 4,000 Jews because Vizier Joseph ibn Naghrela had risen to a position greater than them, and of course, this upset the Muslim sensitivities. [2]

Read more
 

Arabs Hated The Quran
 
How the Arabs Hated The Quran
 
Old Quran
Wh y are you a Muslim?
Musli ms in general love to hear the above question because it has a simple and readymade answer in their minds besides it gives them the opp or t u nity to propagate their religion and talk proudly about Islam.

A typical Muslim’s answer would be like this: ‘because Islam is the right religion and the only one that is accepted by Allah’. Having made such a confident start, Muslims wait impatiently to hear the next question which they predict and to which they also have a readymade answer:
Read more
 

Lepanto Anniversary

Decisive Victory for the West

At this time of year, it is timely to remember one of the greatest victories of the west against the Islamic world. On the 7th October in 1571, Don Juan and the Holy League, led by Admiral Doria, defeated the larger Ottoman fleet in the Battle of Lepanto, saving Europe from the Turks and militant Islam. The Holy League was a coalition of different armies - of the Republic of Venice, the Papacy (under Pope Pius V), Spain (including Naples, Sicily and Sardinia), the Republic of Genoa, the Duchy of Savoy, the Knights Hospitaller and some others. Pope Pius V knew the significance of the battle – that Europe would be overrun by Islam if the Turks won – so he called all Europe to pray as never before. As there was no internet at the time, messengers on horseback were sent to as many places as possible to spread the word. There was certainly a feeling of unity of will – politically and spiritually in Europe and the response to the Pope’s call was immediate and positive, even if the Holy League was not that good a navy. 

Read more
 

The Big Picture
We are at war with Militant Islam and those who support and appease its agenda. And I guess anyone who has knowledge of recent history, would agree with me, that we have been at war with this ideology since the late 1960’s when the Islamists began their terrorist campaign against the west, by hijacking airliners. The Islamists, emboldened by the compliance to their demands of western governments, particularly those in Europe, have, since their first forays into terror, now become an adept world wide movement which threatens ALL nations with extinction. But this is not a conventional war in the sense that we have a recognizable enemy that we may close with in combat. Our enemy refuses to fight openly knowing they cannot match the might of the Coalition forces so chooses instead to fight using guerilla tactics. Part of those tactics is to commit acts of unbelievable cruelty and barbarity against those who cannot defend themselves with the intention of fracturing our societies. Our enemy is ruthless, cunning and prepared to die for his cause. In this regard we should never underestimate his strength of purpose and resolve.
Read more
 

Muslim Jerusalem
Jerusalem - Coat of ArmsWhy do Muslims insist that Jerusalem is their Holy City?
When Mohamed and his faithful followers moved from Mecca to Medina, they found themselves among three Jewish tribes/clans (BANU-L-NADIR, BANU KAINUKA and BANU KURAIZA)  which settled there some time after their expulsion from their homeland and also living there were  two Arab, pagan tribes.

Mohammed, who at this stage needed more followers, decided to win those tribes over and convert them to his newly invented religion.

Islam was yet not as fully developed as we know it today, and Mohammed was still having his sessions with Allah (the Medina period revelations).
Read more
 

Killing of Banu Quraiza
Did Prophet Muhammad order Killing Surrendered Jews of Banu Quraiza and Khaybar?  A historical Analysis

In the post 9/11 era of this modern-world, Islamists around the globe are busy with ‘damage control utopia’ in order to correct the image of religion Islam. We all know that the nucleus of Islam are: Quran, Hadiths (Sunnah) supported by Islamic histories and biographies recorded by various famous Islamic scholars and historians. Now, if we read Quran, hadiths and historical accounts (written by famous Muslim and non-Muslim historians) of Islam with our neutral mind-set, we can easily discover myriads of evidences which are the testament of the fact that unlike any other world’s organized religions, Islam was an Arab political and imperialistic ideology which was propagated by the sword.
 
Read more
 

Islam will Lose

 ...so will the West

Devout MuslimIslam is currently passing through one of its most dynamic times since its rise fourteen hundreds years ago. This dynamic period started long before 9/11 as a fierce struggle, mainly against the west, but also against any nation or group that dares to stand in its way.   Most Muslims take this resurgence phase very seriously and consider it as a decisive battle between Islam and the non-Islam, or the kufr, which Mohammed told them they would win. Even though the west, currently, is largely in denial about this makes no difference to the significance of this conflict to the whole world. 
 

 

Read more
 

What Mecca?
A great tragedy of the Islamic control of our universities and political correctness plus the fear of extreme violence if anyone dares question the roots and claims of Islam is ...that nobody dares question the roots and claims of Islam!!!  I want to stimulate interest and offer this summary of information on Mecca from (LINK) which discusses some problems with Muslim claims in a comparison of evidence supporting Islam/Christianity. 
Read more
 

Lebanon

 A Country which is  NO MORE

Lebanon – once the Paris of the Middle East, now an Islamic hellhole

Brigitte Gabriel, a Lebanese Christian, spoke in Melbourne recently and we were privileged to be in the audience.

Her words sound a warning to all those who cherish freedom. She personally attests to the disintegration of freedom and safety once a country comes under Islamic subjugation. It’s hard to believe it could happen in Australia, but then who would have thought that the Paris of the Middle East could descend into such chaos. Come to think of it, looks as if the Paris of Europe is at risk of suffering the same fate! Maybe we can learn from these countries before it is too late.
Read more
 

Yahweh or Hubal
FlagThere is a very strongly entrenched view among majority of Westerners today that the three main monotheistic religions Judaism, Christianity and Islam share one common God and therefore despite the obvious differences, the core foundation of these three religions is the same.

Throughout several centuries many millions o Christians converted to Islam believing just that.
 
Read more
 



Blacklisted by AIM

Blacklisted by AIM: La Trobe University

Reason: For introducing religious apartheid on its campuses  (see this LINK for more details)

 

 Reported by Persephone